ScreenTheDeal

A complete sample. What you receive is this, for your listing.

SPECIMEN · a real scan of a public marketplace listing, shown as our worked example. Identifying details are withheld.
ScreenTheDealACQUISITION SCREEN · DECISION SUPPORT
Scan memo · Prepared 27 Aug 2026
Source: a public marketplace listing
Public materials only · No seller contact
A men's grooming review site

Listed on a public marketplace · Ask $34,100 · Seller-stated profit $1,282/mo · Niche: men's grooming product reviews

VERDICT
PRICE‑IT
Buyable, but not at ask, and one traffic figure you don't have yet decides whether even our number holds.
Listed at$34,100
Our supported price$18,400
Supportable range$15,500 – $21,000
Total haircut–$15,700 (46%)
If traffic is sub-floor (§3)~$3k, or walk

The one-line read: the multiple the seller is asking is fair. The profit figure it is applied to is not: it ignores the work, and it assumes an ad account that does not come with the sale.

1Transferability: does the money actually convey? CONDITIONAL

The site earns from essentially one rail: Raptive display ads. Two public checks point the same way: the site's own ads.txt carries the Raptive/CafeMedia/AdThrive seller stack, and that ad stack runs throughout the page source (140+ ad-slot and script references per page). In five long-form articles we opened (5,500–12,500 words each), we found no affiliate links. So the visible monetization is display-led.

A Raptive account should not be presumed to transfer with the sale. The publisher contract is with the current owner; a buyer normally has to be approved under a new publisher relationship, or get Raptive's written sign-off on the change of ownership. Raptive's published floor to be accepted is 25,000 pageviews per month. The listing shows 16,200 monthly "views." If that figure is pageviews, the buyer is below the line and re-approval is not a given, and the site then falls back to ordinary AdSense/Ezoic, where the same traffic earns roughly half. If it is sessions, pageviews are likely above the floor and re-approval is far more plausible. Which reading is correct decides whether this is an $18k asset or close to a write-down (see the sensitivity in §3). Public data can't settle it, so it is Blocking Question #1.

2Disqualifying findings NONE CONFIRMED

No fraud or misrepresentation indicator surfaced: the domain, the 168 published reviews, and the live Raptive ad stack are all real and consistent with the listing. The one condition that could make this a walk (Raptive re-approval failing at sub-floor traffic) is unresolved, not proven, so it is priced as risk and asked as a question below.

3What changes the price

Frame first: at $34,100 on $15,384/yr profit, the ask is 2.22× annual profit (~27× monthly), inside the usual content-site band of roughly 2.0–2.8× (~24–34× monthly). So the ask is fair on the multiple. The gap is in the profit figure, which is why the haircuts below adjust the earnings, not the multiple.

A. Unpriced owner labor: the profit is really a wage –$14,400

A 168-article review site doesn't hold its Google rankings by itself, and the posts carry "last-updated" stamps running into April 2026; it is actively maintained, not parked. That labor is not in the seller's profit number (owner-operated sites almost never charge their own time). Price it at a replacement rate and the "profit" shrinks:

5 hrs/week × $25/hr × 52 = $6,500/yr of real cost  →  adjusted profit $15,384 − $6,500 = $8,884/yr.   At the seller's own 2.22× multiple, removing $6,500 of cost removes 6,500 × 2.22 = $14,400 of value.

B. Raptive re-onboarding gap, one-time –$1,300

Because the ad account is re-applied for rather than transferred, expect roughly 2–4 weeks with ads off or throttled during onboarding, about one month of display income. Best structured as an escrow holdback released once monetization is confirmed uninterrupted, rather than a certainty.

≈ 1 month × ~$1,300 display income = –$1,300 one-time.

Build to the supported priceAmount
Listed price$34,100
A · Unpriced owner labor at the seller's multiple $6,500/yr × 2.22×–$14,400
B · Raptive re-onboarding gap one-time / holdback–$1,300
Supported price midpoint; range $15,500–$21,000 on 4–6 hrs/wk of labor$18,400
THE FIGURE THAT MOVES EVERYTHING: settle it before you offer

The revenue and the traffic don't reconcile: $1,282/mo ÷ 16,200 views ≈ $79 per 1,000 views (RPM), and display ads pay about $15–$40. So either the real traffic is much higher than 16,200, the profit is a temporary peak, or the two numbers come from different periods. Which it is also decides the Raptive question in §1, so we price the two readings side by side rather than guess:

If "16,200 views" turns out to be…ThenSupported
Sessions (pageviews ≥ 25K)Raptive re-approves; profit is real~$18,400
Pageviews (< 25K floor)Raptive fails → AdSense; display RPM ~halves → ~$7,700/yr − $6,500 labor ≈ $1,200 × 2.22×~$3,000

One Google Analytics screenshot (Blocking Q#1) collapses this range. Until it exists, treat $18,400 as a ceiling.

4Standard category risks NORMAL · not verdict drivers

  • Google dependency: traffic is ~100% organic search. Every content site of this size carries it.
  • AI Overviews: informational grooming queries increasingly answered on the results page; a category-wide headwind.
  • Short history: ~2 years old, content built in one burst in early 2024; limited track record through Google's swings.

5What's genuinely good, including free upside

★ A review site with buyer intent and no affiliate links = money on the floor

Pages like "best head shavers" and "best beard trimmer" are read by people about to buy a $40–$200 product, and the current owner captures none of that intent (no affiliate links in the five articles we opened). Adding affiliate links across the 168 posts is a low-cost, additive rail. At today's traffic the dollars are modest, but the real prize is diversification off the single non-transferable ad account, the exact risk in §1.

Also real: substantial content, not a thin shell (168 long-form articles, several over 10,000 words, with a stated hands-on testing method); and it is already on Raptive, a network that is hard to join, so if traffic clears the floor the buyer inherits premium display rates without the onboarding grind. A basic email capture is already in place.

6Send these to the seller, verbatim

  1. "Please share a screenshot of Google Analytics showing monthly pageviews and sessions for the last 12 months. I need to confirm whether the '16,200 views' figure is pageviews or sessions."
  2. "Is the Raptive account included, and can you provide written confirmation from Raptive that a new owner can be onboarded at the site's current traffic? Please also share your last three Raptive payment statements."
  3. "Please break down the $1,282/month: how much is Raptive display vs. anything else, and does the profit figure deduct any content, hosting, or contractor costs?"
  4. "How many hours per week does this site take, and who writes and updates the articles: you, freelancers, or AI tools? What did the last 12 months of content cost?"
  5. "Show me monthly organic traffic since launch. I want to see whether the trailing average hides a decline after any Google update."
  6. "Exactly what conveys at closing: domain, content, Google Analytics, the email list, and the Raptive account, or only an introduction to Raptive?"

7Confidence & limits

Identity: Confirmed. The domain resolves to a live men's grooming review site matching the listing; the marketplace discloses the domain publicly. It is withheld in this public sample.

We measured (ran it against public data):
  • Registration 2023-10 (registry lookup); first archived 2024-04
  • 168 posts (sitemap); articles 5.5k–12.5k words; updates to Apr 2026
  • Raptive display stack in ads.txt + throughout page source
  • No affiliate links in 5 sampled articles
  • Raptive's 25,000-PV floor (Raptive's own creator page)
We inferred (needs seller confirmation):
  • Whether "views" = pageviews or sessions
  • The revenue split and its month-to-month stability
  • Owner hours and content cost
We could not check (seller- or platform-held):
  • The marketplace's detailed financials (member login)
  • Raptive payout statements; Google Analytics traffic
Corroboration: registry lookup, archived-history check, ad-stack & source inspection, third-party threshold confirmation. No paid data tools.
Decision support, not a recommendation to buy or not buy, and not a legal or accounting opinion. Built entirely from publicly viewable materials; we did not contact the seller or access any account. Figures marked "seller-stated" are the listing's own claims. You own the decision. ScreenTheDeal · free during early access · 24-hour turnaround · our fee never depends on the verdict.